WHERE IS MARSHAL DILLON?

0

inShare. Comments (6)

Larger
Smaller

Printable Version

Email This

Georgia (default)

Verdana

Times New Roman

Arial






A: Special cars with reconfigured interior for bikes and riders, marked with obvious wide red stripe and huge letter B.



Q: What will this do?



A: Provide access to BART for all and access to doors for exiting.



How many of you have missed your stop or had to push and paw through masses of bikes and people to reach the door in time? You know what I mean.



Issue solved.



Marge Jencks, Berkeley





Give bicyclists their own car

I agree with the comments of Peter Lawrence, "How to match BART and bikes" (Letter, Aug. 3). Bike riders are not allowed in the first car, but they ignore this, the same as they ignore advice not to enter crowded cars and ignore the "no bike" rule during commute hours.



By all means, bring in bike-only cars. With regard to airport passengers, who think that they can block up to four seats, yes, bring in separate cars.



Mervyn Williams, Daly City





Commuting is a real challenge

I had to laugh at the letter saying that commuting by bike in San Francisco doesn't require fitness or bravery ("Taking the edge off biking in the city," Letters, Insight, Aug. 5).



In truth it's arduous and/or dangerous. There are the numerous hills to wind around, most streets are only two lanes wide with parked cars on both sides, the few arterials are jammed with traffic, with cars making right turns right across the path of bikes, and there's the pedestrians who blindly dart into your path. Only the fit, the brave, and the few will ever commute by bike in the city. I never have, and I've been riding my bike for recreation here for 45 years.





Richard Covert, San Francisco







No pension reform - no tax increase

Until the governor and Legislature step up and enact meaningful statewide pension reform ("Pension reform the top priority," Aug. 6), this registered Democrat will not support either Gov. Jerry Brown's Proposition 30 or tax proponent Molly Munger's Prop. 38 in November.



Without legislative action soon on this subject, voters in California are in a mood to "speak" with another Prop. 13, this time directed at pension reform.



This is not the way good government should work, but it is the voters' only recourse when the governor and the legislature are afraid to go up against the powerful unions that support them so generously. Tax increase proposals must be accompanied by pension reform.



Greg Calegari, San Francisco





Church, politics

The writer of "Our archbishop" (Letters, Aug. 4) seems perplexed why anyone might not welcome the appointment of Salvatore Cordileone as the new archbishop since, as she puts it, "no one is held hostage" to the Roman Catholic Church's teachings.



I wish to remind her that the church makes it a practice to try to hold both Catholics and non-Catholics alike hostage by influencing legislation.



If the church would keep its nose out of politics and stop trying to impose its teachings on those who don't adhere to its particular brand of faith, I wouldn't care one whit who does or doesn't get appointed to its hierarchies.



Wayne Studer, Newark





Mayor gets boot

I find it remarkable that Oakland Mayor Jean Quan thinks the police ganged up on her for booting her car when she had over $1,000 of parking tickets prior to becoming mayor ("Quan denies implying police setup," Aug. 4).



How much illegal parking do you have to do to rack up that many fines? I'm sure she can park anywhere she wants now in Oakland without getting a ticket, but did she really believe she had some special lawbreaking privilege before becoming mayor?



Beth DeAtley, Piedmont


Letter to the editor of the San Francisco Chronicle, 8-7-12
Thanks, NRA

The National Rifle Association should be proud.
Another shooting, in a temple in Wisconsin ("FBI to probe killings of 6 at Sikh temple," Aug. 6).
Several dead, many injured. Another victory for the Second Amendment to the Constitution, if you believe the NRA/Republican version.
Are loonies running loose with deadly weapons a "well regulated militia"? Are the loonies necessary to the "security of a free state"?
If many more goofies exercise their "right to bear arms," we the people are in serious trouble. Will we be the actors in a real live "Gunsmoke." Will it become necessary to "bear arms" to have any hope of living through this insanity?
Marshal Dillon, what shall we do? Please meet me at the Long Branch. I need your advice.

M.H. Page, South San Francisco







Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/opinion/letterstoeditor/article/Letters-to-the-editor-Aug-7-3767405.php#ixzz22tLtKbwX